Post by anik4300 on Feb 20, 2024 4:16:29 GMT -5
Approved an agreement signed between the Attorney General of the Republic (PGR), the president of the Chamber of Deputies and the Union (represented by the attorney general of the Union), which he destined for education and environment R$2.6 billion recovered from Petrobras from the Lava Jato operation. In ADIs 6,581 and 6,582, following its vote, the Court established the understanding that the absence of reevaluation of preventive detention within 90 days does not imply the automatic revocation of custody. He was also the leading vote in the judgment of Extraordinary Appeal (RE) 1,307,334, with general repercussions (Theme 1,127), in which the constitutionality of the seizure of family property belonging to a guarantor of residential and commercial lease contracts was established. . Likewise, in RE 608.880, in which the Court recognized that the State's objective civil liability for damages resulting from a crime committed by a person escaping from the prison system is only characterized when the causal link between the moment of escape and the crime is demonstrated.
Regarding the Clean Record Law (Complementary Law 135/2010), the STF followed Minister Alexandre's vote and rejected ADI 6,630, which sought to re-discuss the validity of the provision that sets the period of ineligibility at eight years after serving the sentence. With information from the press office of the Federal Supreme Court.oes not constitute a database, does not require the consumer's consent, who w USA Phone Number ill have the right to request clarifications about the personal information valued and the sources of data considered in the respective calculation. reproduction Reproduction Serasa does not need to remove taxpayer data from its platforms, decides TJ-SP The understanding is that of the 14th Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo when denying a consumer's request that Serasa be forced to remove their personal data from platforms such as "Lista Online", "Customer Prospecting" and "Info Busca ", in addition to the payment of compensation for moral damages.
The first instance court dismissed the action as unfounded as it understood that the data disclosed was merely registration data and not sensitive. In a unanimous vote, the TJ-SP confirmed the sentence. According to the rapporteur, judge Anna Paula Dias da Costa, the disclosure of data is for the exclusive purpose of credit protection, that is, it is intended only for analyzing the risk in granting credit. "Furthermore, the data contained (name, CPF, telephone number, address, mother's name, date of birth, gender and income) do not belong to the restricted sphere of sensitive data and are usually shared by the individuals themselves in different environments: establishments commercials, websites, cell phone applications, civil associations, educational institutions, among others", stated the judge. Costa acknowledged that the data in question does not fall within the category of “sensitive data” provided for in the General Data Protection Law (LGPD), since it is information normally requested and provided by the citizen to carry out numerous acts of civil life not They are confidential and not sensitive.
Regarding the Clean Record Law (Complementary Law 135/2010), the STF followed Minister Alexandre's vote and rejected ADI 6,630, which sought to re-discuss the validity of the provision that sets the period of ineligibility at eight years after serving the sentence. With information from the press office of the Federal Supreme Court.oes not constitute a database, does not require the consumer's consent, who w USA Phone Number ill have the right to request clarifications about the personal information valued and the sources of data considered in the respective calculation. reproduction Reproduction Serasa does not need to remove taxpayer data from its platforms, decides TJ-SP The understanding is that of the 14th Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo when denying a consumer's request that Serasa be forced to remove their personal data from platforms such as "Lista Online", "Customer Prospecting" and "Info Busca ", in addition to the payment of compensation for moral damages.
The first instance court dismissed the action as unfounded as it understood that the data disclosed was merely registration data and not sensitive. In a unanimous vote, the TJ-SP confirmed the sentence. According to the rapporteur, judge Anna Paula Dias da Costa, the disclosure of data is for the exclusive purpose of credit protection, that is, it is intended only for analyzing the risk in granting credit. "Furthermore, the data contained (name, CPF, telephone number, address, mother's name, date of birth, gender and income) do not belong to the restricted sphere of sensitive data and are usually shared by the individuals themselves in different environments: establishments commercials, websites, cell phone applications, civil associations, educational institutions, among others", stated the judge. Costa acknowledged that the data in question does not fall within the category of “sensitive data” provided for in the General Data Protection Law (LGPD), since it is information normally requested and provided by the citizen to carry out numerous acts of civil life not They are confidential and not sensitive.